Computer assisted surgery versus conventional artroscopic placement of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. - A prospective randomized clinical trial-

Computer assisted surgery versus conventional artroscopic placement of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. - A prospective randomized clinical trial- - CAS versus conventional anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

NL-OMON

Registry ID

NL-OMON29918

Enrollment

Registered

2006-09-12

Start date

2006-12-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-08-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

rupture of anterior cruciate ligament

Interventions

conventional arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction versus computer assisted technique.

Eligibility

Age

18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients with a rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament indicated for reconstructive surgery, Age of 18 year and above.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Insufficient command of the Dutch language, spoken and/or written; Patients from which it is not sure that they will be able to attend the follow-up measurements.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
the tunnel position of the transplant using conventional surgery will be compared to the computer assisted technique.	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
The two groups will also be compared using IKDC score, knee disability and outcome score, VAS pain score, Lysholm and Tegner score, objective stability, isokinetic testing, health care consumption and cost and in final satisfaction of treatment.	—

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)