Comparison of the fixation and stability of two bone substitutes: Pro Osteon and Calcibon by revision of the acetabulum prosthesis with RSA

Comparison of the fixation and stability of two bone substitutes: Pro Osteon and Calcibon by revision of the acetabulum prosthesis with RSA - Comparison of Pro Osteon and Calcibon during revision THA

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

NL-OMON

Registry ID

NL-OMON29776

Enrollment

Registered

2006-08-08

Start date

2006-06-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-06-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

revision total hip

Interventions

All patients will obtain a cemented Stanmore acetabulum cup prosthesis. By 10 patients the bone defects will be filled with Pro-Osteon and by 10 patients the bone deficits will be filled with Calcib

Eligibility

Age

18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Needing revision surgery for a loose acetabulum component Age above 18 years old Insufficient bone stock for fixation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Infection per-operative insufficient bone stock

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Migration of the prosthesis	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Pain, function and patient satisfaction	—

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)