Skip to content

Implementation of a strategy of osteoporosis screening in patients over 50 years of age with a first fracture

Implementation of a strategy of osteoporosis screening in patients over 50 years of age with a first fracture, with intensive treatment and follow-up by a nurse-practitioner to prevent recurrent fractures in those patients with diagnosed osteoporosis

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON29608
Enrollment
1650
Registered
2007-08-07
Start date
2007-09-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-02-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

osteoporosis (osteoporose, botontkalking) fracture (fractuur, botbreuk) implementation (implementatie) nurse-practitioner (fractuur verpleegkundige)

Interventions

In the implementation group the patients will be screened for osteoporosis by DXA measurement, and a spine X ray will be performed. At baseline and after 12 months a blood sample will be taken. At bas

Sponsors

VUmc
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: All patients 50 years of age or older, who have a clinical fracture and a low BMD defined as a T score smaller or equal 2.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients with a fracture after a traffic accident 2. Patients with a pathological fracture 3. Patients with fractures of hand, foot or scull 4. Serious comorbidity or dementia 5. Incapable of visiting the out patient clinic

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Is it possible to improve routine detection and treatment of osteoporosis after an initial fracture? 1.Is it possible to increase the proportion of patients adequately screened and categorized as to the presence of osteoporosis from current practice of 5-40% to at least 70%? 2. In patients found to have osteoporosis, is it possible to: a. start treatment in nearly all applicable patients? b. maintain the proportion of patients still on anti osteoporotis treatment after 1 year at 70% of those starting treatment?

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Are the data on subsequent fracture rates compatible with a reduction to 4%? 2. Is the proportion of patients screened for osteoporosis with a DXA measurement significantly higher in the implementation group (with fracture nurse) than in the control group (without a fracture nurse; 'usual care')? 3. Is the proportion of patients still on anti osteoporosis treatment after 1 year significantly higher in the implementation group than in the control group? 4. What are the costs associated with the implementation of an osteoporosis nurse and how do these costs compare to the health benefits obtained. 5. What are the practical barriers encountered in trying to achieve the above mentioned goals? 6. What are the practical barriers in the implementation of an osteoporosis nurse, and how can these be overcome?

Contacts

Public ContactDA Eekman

VU Medical Center depatment of rheumatology 4a-42 Boelelaan 1117

d.eekman@vumc.nl+31 20-4443432

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)