Flexible versus Acrylic Removable Partial Dentures (RPDs) for Provisionalization in the Anterior Region: Oral Health-Related Quality of Life and Patient Satisfaction

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

NL-OMON

Registry ID

NL-OMON29507

Enrollment

Registered

2020-09-11

Start date

2020-09-11

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-02-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Missing teeth

Interventions

Flexible RPD (1,5 month), acrylic RPD (1,5 month)

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: • One missing or failing tooth (for at least 3 months), being an incisor (central or lateral), canine or premolar in the maxilla, the adjacent teeth are natural teeth; • Large bony defect that requires a ridge preservation/ridge augmentation procedure for implant placement; • Adequate oral hygiene (modified plaque index and modified sulcus bleeding index); • Sufficient mesio-distal, bucco-lingual, and interocclusal space for placement of an anatomic restoration; • The patient is capable of understanding and giving informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: • Medical and general contraindications for the surgical procedures; • Presence of an active and uncontrolled periodontal disease; • Bruxism; • Smoking; • A history of local radiotherapy to the head and neck region.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
OHRQoL (5-point Likert-type scale)	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
overall satisfaction (VAS 1-100), function, comfort and esthetics (5-point Likert-type scale)	—

Contacts

Public ContactVincent Donker

University Medical Center Groningen

v.j.j.donker@umcg.nl+31681723511

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)