Skip to content

OsteoActivator-P for accelerated localized alveolar ridge preservation

A randomized prospective clinical trial comparing OsteoActivator-P coated membranes vs Collagen Membrane-P uncoated for accelerated localized alveolar ridge preservation.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON29312
Enrollment
16
Registered
2021-03-17
Start date
2021-07-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-06-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Healthy patients with a ruinous dentition (including the canines) in the lower jaw in need of extractions of all teeth of the mandible.

Interventions

This will be a split mouth study design. The alveolar ridge preservation will be applied on the two canine regions of the mandible. The alveolar extraction sockets of the canines will be filled with a

Sponsors

Osteo Pharma
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: • Males and females, aged =18 years. • Patient has signed informed consent. • Patients with a ruinous dentition (including the canines) in the lower jaw in need of extractions of all teeth of the mandible. • Patients in need of a total dental prosthesis in the lower jaw. • Patients that want an implant-based denture in the lower jaw. • Bone width of at least 7mm • Bone height beneath the root-point of the canines at least 10mm

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: • Absence of the lower canines • History of treatment with bisphosphonates or denosumab • History of radiotherapy in the head/neck region • Poor oral hygiene • Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding • Compromised immune system (e.g. uncontrolled diabetis) or unstable bleeding disorder. • Patients with ASA classification of III or worse • Local infection at the site of implantation • History of previous ridge augmentation/preservation at the site of interest • History of oral cancer or radiation of the oral cavity. • Current malignancy • Unresolved oral pathologies • Refusing the implantation of porcine material • Highly atrophic mandible (Cawood classification V or higher) • Known allergy to collagen. • Heavy smoking (> 20 cigarettes/day).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
• To histologically assess and compare new bone formation and bone quality 8 weeks after socket preservation with OsteoActivator-P porcine pericard membranes containing alendronate and testosterone to Collagen Membrane-P uncoated. • To assess the safety of the use of OsteoActivator-P porcine pericard membranes in the treatment of alveolar ridge preservation.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
• To assess and compare new bone formation and bone quality by computed tomography 8 weeks after socket preservation with OsteoActivator-P porcine pericard membranes containing alendronate and testosterone to Collagen Membrane-P uncoated. • To determine the ease of use of OsteoActivator-P porcine pericard membranes for alveolar ridge preservation. • Implant site inspection • To assess reliable implant placement at 8 weeks with application of OsteoActivator-P porcine pericard membranes containing alendronate and testosterone as compared to standard of care (Collagen Membrane-P uncoated). • Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) at implantation and after 12 weeks. • Patient satisfaction

Contacts

Public ContactNynke Lie

Maastricht University Medical Center

suen.lie@mumc.nl+31433872010

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)