Skip to content

Comparison of short course cyclophosphamide followed by mycophenolate mofetil versus long course cyclophosphamide in the treatment of proliferative lupus nephritis.

Second Dutch Lupus Nephritis trial.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON29290
Enrollment
124
Registered
2005-10-07
Start date
2003-01-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-02-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Patients with SLE and biopsy proven proliferative lupus nephritis

Interventions

Cyclophosphamide, mycophenolate, prednisone.

Sponsors

None listed

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Age 18 - 70 yrs; 2. SLE (presence of at least 4 ACR-criteria for SLE; 3. Proliferative lupus nephritis: a. Biopsy proven lupus nephritis WHO class III or IV (according to Churg 1995). and b. “Active sediment”. > 5 ery’s per HPF and/or celcylinders and c. Proteïnuria > 0.5 g/day; 4. Adequate anticonception; 5. Informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Active infection; 2. Pregnancy; 3. Known allergy for one of the study drugs; 4. Malignancy < 5 years prior to inclusion.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Number of renal relapses.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Longitudinal follow-up of creatinine, proteïnuria, sediment, complement levels, anti-dsDNA, SLEDAI, SLICC, Dutch lupus nephritis questionaire, SF-36, renal histology, IF-skin; 2. Extra-renale exacerbaties van de SLE; 3. Zwangerschap; 4. Overlijden.

Contacts

Public ContactMarc Bijl

University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), Department of Clinical Immunology, P.O. Box 30.001

m.bijl@int.umcg.nl+31 (0)50 3612945

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)