Skip to content

The effectiveness of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) versus interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT) in panic disorder without agoraphobia.

The effectiveness of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) versus interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT) in panic disorder without agoraphobia.

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON29181
Enrollment
80
Registered
2006-06-13
Start date
1997-06-05
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-02-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

There are two conditions

Interventions

Patients will receive 12 therapeutic sessions of either CBT or IPT. Once a week a sessions takes place ande one session takes one hour.

Sponsors

Maastricht University EPP (Experimental Psychopathology)
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. main diagnosis panic disorder without agoraphobia; 2. aged between 18 and 60.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. co morbid psychosis or bipolar disorder; 2. the use of psychoactive drugs; 3. Intelligence Quotient (IQ) < 80; 4. insufficient knowledge of the Dutch language; 5. previous formal IPT or CBT received (for the same complaint in the past year); 6. alcohol or drugs dependency; 7. cardiovascular disease; 8. respiratory disease; 9. epilepsy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1. panic free status (defined with panic diaries); 2. performance on a behavioural test (3 situations). Panic diaries are completed at 0 months (pre-treatment), during treatment, 3 months (post treatment), 4 months (follow up 1) and 9 months (follow up 2). Performance on the behavioural test is assessed at 0 months (pre-treatment), 4 months (follow up 1) and 9 months (follow up 2).

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. a composite measure of panic and agoraphobic measures (FQ v+a, main fobia, ASI, FOF, …); 2. a composite measure of cognitive measures (e.g. BSIQ-14, ACQ); 3. an interpersonal measure (IIP); 4. a composite measure of general psychopathology (SCL-90, STAI). The outcomes are assessed at 0 months (pre-treatment), 3 months (post treatment), 4 months (follow up 1) and 9 months (follow up 2).

Contacts

Public ContactLinsey Diels

University Maastricht (UM), Department of Clinical, Medical, and Experimental Psychology, P.O.Box 616

L.Diels@dmkep.unimaas.nl+31 (0)43 3881264

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)