Skip to content

Localization of electroctutaneous stimuli.

The influence of stimulus parameters on the reported location of electrocutaneous stimuli.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON29141
Enrollment
155
Registered
2011-04-19
Start date
2011-05-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-06-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Touch Tast Nociception Nociceptie Electrocutaneous stimulation Elektrocutane stimulatie Subjective localization Subjectieve localisatie Body schema Lichaamsschema

Interventions

Subjects receive electrocutaneous stimulati at 8 sites on their forearm. The electrode positions are hidden for the subjects by a tablet screen which presents a picture of the arm without electrodes.

Sponsors

Universiteit Twente
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Healthy subjects aged 18-30 years.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Skin condition on left arm; 2. Excessive amount of hair on left arm.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Reported perceived stimulus locations: Subjects report the perceived location of each stimulus on the tablet monitor after each trial.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Sensation thresholds (minimum stimulus current which elicits a sensation): The stimulus current which is required to elicit a sensation using electrocutaneous stimulation differs between subjects and stimulus sites. Therefore at the start of each experiment, the sensation thresholds will be determined for each of the stimulus sites; 2. Perceived stimulus intensity and quality: Electrocutaneous stimulation can lead do different sensations depending on the innervation of the stimulus site. Large differences in quality (dull, sharp) or intensity provide unwanted clues to subjects for distinguishing the sites. Therefore. at the start of each experments, subjects will rate the quality and intensity on a continuous scale of 0-10. Electrodes of which the scores deviate from the others will be excluded from analysis.

Contacts

Public ContactPeter Steenbergen

Universiteit Twente Drieneriolaan 5

p.steenbergen@ewi.utwente.nl

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)