Skip to content

Breath testing for asthma and COPD.

The diagnostic accuracy of exhaled breath fingerprinting by eNose for asthma and COPD in patients with an intention to diagnose.

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON28944
Enrollment
80
Registered
2010-05-11
Start date
2010-05-17
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-02-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

asthma, COPD, diagnostic accuracy, STARD, intention to diagnose astma, COPD, diagnostische waarde, STARD, verdenking diagnose

Interventions

Electronic nose: The Cyranose 320 (Smith Detections, Pasadena, Ca, USA), a handheld portable chemical vapor analyzer, containing a nanocomposite sensor array with 32 polymer sensors. Patients will bre

Sponsors

Academic Medical Centre Amsterdam
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients (>16 years old) getting a diagnostic work-up for asthma or COPD in the Academic Medical Centre (Amsterdam) will be included in the study; 2. Differential diagnosis of asthma, COPD, obstructive lung disease; 3. Clinical evaluation for reversibility (FEV1), airway hyperresponsiveness, airway obstruction.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Known current diagnosis of asthma and/or COPD.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary outcome parameter is the breathprint provided by the electronic nose.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. FEV1; 2. Reversibility in FEV1; 3. PC20 airway hyperresponsiveness; 4. Respiratory symptoms.

Contacts

Public ContactNiki Fens

Clinical Research Fellow 'Electronic Nose' Academic Medical Center (AMC) University of Amsterdam Department of Pulmonology F5-260 P.O.Box 22660

N.Fens@amc.nl+31 (0)20 5664359

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)