Skip to content

Cryo strip versus classic strip of the great saphenous vein.

Cryo strip versus classic strip of the great saphenous vein.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON28805
Enrollment
520
Registered
2007-03-10
Start date
2002-08-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-02-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cryo strip VSM GSV Klassieke strip Venous Venous surgery Veneus Classic strip Great saphenous vein Vene saphena magna

Interventions

Cryo strip of the great saphenous vein versus classic strip of the great saphnous vein.

Sponsors

initatiors : T.M.A.L. Klem / C.H.A. Wittens / R. Schutte performers: T.M.A.L. Klem / M. Schnater / A. van Oers / C.H.A. Wittens / R. Schutte
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients with primary varicosis and incompetence of the great saphenous vein and saphenofemoral junction (confirmed by duplex). Only patients with C2, C3, C4 varicosis (CEAP-classification).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. C5, C6 varicosis; 2. Extreme adipositas (BMI>40); 3. Deep venous occlusion; 4. Incompetence of the small saphenous vein; 5. Aarterial occlusive disease of the legs; 6. Inability to understand the Dutch language; 7. Recurrence of varicosis of the leg.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Recurrence, confirmed by venous duplex.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Operation time; 2. Neurological damage after surgery; 3. Quality of life.

Contacts

Public ContactT.M.A.L. Klem
t.klem@wxs.nl

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)