Skip to content

Evaluation of the use of a patient questionnaire in measuring patient reported outcomes of medication reviews

Evaluation of the effects of a community pharmacist-led medication review on patient reported outcomes (PROM) as measured with a questionnaire: a pilot randomised controlled trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON28732
Enrollment
200
Registered
2014-11-05
Start date
2014-09-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-02-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

adverse drug reactions (ADRs), side effects of drugs, medication adherence (MARS), beliefs about medicines necessity and concerns (BMQ), self efficacy (MUSE)

Interventions

All participating pharmacists receive material and written instructions for patient selection, interventions and process registrations. Pharmacists are supported by the researcher in following the stu
their medication review starts subsequent to this measurement.

Sponsors

Radboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ Healthcare, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients eligible for a community pharmacist-led medication review according to the guidelines (use of 5 or more prescribed chronic systemic drugs). Other criteria to achieve the intended study population of 20 patients per pharmacy to be determined by the pharmacist, like: age over 65, specific chronic diseases, general practitioner (GP) of the patient.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: To be assessed by the community pharmacists considering: - cognitive or communication impairments; - other recently performed pharmacotherapy interventions; - not willing or unable to participate in study according to GP.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Total number of ADRs, as reported through the PROM questionnaire at follow up measurement.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Patient reported scores on health perception, beliefs about medication (BMQ) necessity, beliefs about medication (BMQ) concerns, self efficacy (MUSE), and medication adherence (MARS) at follow up measurement. Change of the number of patients who report ADRs at follow up measurement. Change of the ADRs that were reported at baseline at follow up measurement compared between the intervention and the control group.

Contacts

Public ContactT. Schoenmakers

Pharmacist, PhD Student Radboud University Medical Center P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen

tim.schoenmakers@radboudumc.nl+31(0)24 3615305

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)