Skip to content

PSMA-PET/CT in Primary Staging of Prostate Cancer

Diagnostic accuracy of 68Ga PSMA-PET/CT in newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON28484
Enrollment
100
Registered
2017-11-13
Start date
2017-10-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-02-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diagnostic accuracy of Gallium-68 PSMA-PET/CT in newly diagnosed high-risk prostate cancer patients Diagnostische accuratesse van Gallium-68 PSMA-PET/CT bij nieuw-gediagnosticeerde patienten met hoog-risico prostaatcarcinoom

Interventions

None

Sponsors

University Medical Center Utrecht
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Biopsy proven adenocarcinoma of the prostate with an indication for pelvic lymph node dissection (with or without robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy) 2. Mentally competent and understanding of benefits and potential burden of the study 3. Written informed consent 4. Age ¡Ý18 years

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. History of prior diagnosed or treated PCa. 2. Known concomitant malignancies (except Basal Cell Carcinoma of the skin). 3. Any unrelated illness that in the judgment of the investigator will significantly affect patient¡¯s clinical status. 4. Unwillingness or inability to undergo PSMA-PET/CT.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Patient and lesion-based diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV) of PSMA-PET/CT in detection of lymph node metastases.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
a. Diagnostic performance of PSMA-PET/CT in detection of distant metastases. b. Diagnostic performance of PSMA-PET/CT in staging of the primary tumor in the prostate specimen. c. Detection rate of PSMA-PET/CT as a function of PSA level and size of suspected lymph nodes. d. Diagnostic performance of PSMA-PET/CT versus conventional imaging (skeletal scintigraphy, MRI of the prostate) in detection of metastases. e. Change of management induced by PSMA-PET/CT findings. f. Costs associated with PSMA-PET/CT as diagnostic modality additional to the regular diagnostic work-up versus conventional imaging and pelvic lymph node dissection.

Contacts

Public ContactL.W.M. van Kalmthout

UMC Utrecht, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine

L.W.M.vanKalmthout-2@umcutrecht.nl+316-28962091

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)