Skip to content

Conventional vascular closure device vs Statseal hemostasis: Comparing the effects on hand sensibility for radial hemostasis

Conventional vascular closure device vs Statseal hemostasis: Comparing the effects on hand sensibility for radial hemostasis

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON28346
Enrollment
250
Registered
2019-04-15
Start date
2019-05-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-02-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diminished hand sensibility after transradial access heart catheterisation

Interventions

To compare hemostasis after transradial access by using Statseal and 60 minutes of applied pressure by vascular closing device to 2 full hours of applied pressure by the vascular closing device withou

Sponsors

None yet.
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: - Patients admitted for transradial coronary angiography - Older than 18 years - Able and willing to give informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: - Previous TRA through the same radial artery - Previous upper limb surgery

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Prevention of diminished hand sensibility after transradial access by shorter wrist compression time using Statseal hemostasis.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Evaluation of the effect of shorter wrist compression time on hand function (questionnaires and grip testing) Prevention of bleeding complications and hematomas

Contacts

Public ContactFrank Reinink

Haaglanden Medisch Centrum

reinink.frank@gmail.com0651759770

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)