Skip to content

Improving knee joint stability in osteoarthritis with exercise therapy: does it work?

A randomised controlled trial of knee joint stabilisation therapy in osteoarthritis of the knee

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON28274
Enrollment
120
Registered
2008-10-03
Start date
2008-12-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-02-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

osteoarthitis, knee, joint instability, elderly, physical functioning, pain, laxity, proprioception, muscle strength, walking. artrose, knie, gewrichtsinstabiliteit, ouderen, fysiek functioneren, pijn, laxiteit, propriocepsis, spierkracht, lopen.

Interventions

21-12-2011 Changes: Experimental group: The experimental intervention comprises a 12-week exercise therapy programme aimed at: 1) improving the knee joint stabilisation process 2) muscle strengthen

Sponsors

This study will be carried out by the VU University Medical Centre (VUmc) and Jan van Breemen Institute in Amsterdam
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 21-12-2011 Changes: 1. Diagnosis of knee OA according to the clinical ACR criteria, i.e.: knee pain and at least three of the following six: age > 50 years, morning stiffness <30 minutes, crepitus, bony tenderness, bony enlargement and no palpable warmth. 2. Age between 40 and 75 years. 3. Sufficient control of the Dutch language. 4. At least one of the following three criteria: * self-reported instability of the knee joint affecting daily functioning, as assessed with Fitzgerald’s knee stability questionnaire. A self-reported knee instability rating of 1 (“the symptom affects my activity mildly”) or worse is regarded to reflect knee instability affecting daily functioning * bodyweight-adjusted isokinetic hamstrings strength of 0.8 Nm/kg or less for men or 0.55 Nm/kg or less for women, in combination with a knee joint proprioception score of 4.3° or higher, as established with the instrumented knee proprioception test * bodyweight-adjusted isokinetic hamstrings strength of 0.8 Nm/kg or less for men or 0.55 Nm/kg or less for women, in combination with a knee joint laxity score of 4.6° or higher for men or 7.7° or higher for women, as established with the instrumented knee laxity test

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Co-morbidity which clearly affects functional ability.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
21-12-2011 Changes: The primary outcome measure in this RCT is self-reported physical functioning as assessed with the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC).

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
21-12-2011 Changes: A number of secondary outcome measures are included in the study, reflecting both the assessment of disabilities in specific daily activities, the patient perspective, and relevant biomechanical factors. These measures are: - perceived global effect (7-point Likert scale) - pain intensity (0-10 NRS) - stiffness (WOMAC) - fatigue (0-10 NRS) - Fitzgerald’s self-reported knee joint instability scale - proprioception - laxity - isokinetic muscle strength of the upper leg (BioDex) - frontal plane alignment of the knee (goniometer) - observed walking and transfer ability as assessed with the Get Up and Go (GUG) test

Contacts

Public ContactM.P.M. (Martijn) Steultjens

VU University Medical Center, Department of Rehabilitation, Occupational and Physical Therapy, P.O. Box 7057

m.steultjens@vumc.nl+31 (0)20 4443063

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)