Skip to content

Wallflex versus Egis stent for palliation of malignant dysphagia’

Wallflex versus Egis stent for palliation of malignant dysphagia’

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON28202
Enrollment
116
Registered
2013-12-05
Start date
2013-12-10
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-02-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

malignant dysphagia maligne dysfagie

Interventions

Patients with malignant dysphagia due to an inoperable malignant obstruction of the esophagus or gastric cardia will be randomly assigned to be treated with a FC Wallflex stent (Boston Scientific, Nat

Sponsors

University Medical Center Utrecht
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: - Dysphagia due to an inoperable malignant obstruction of the esophagus or gastric cardia. • Dysphagia is defined as: dysphagia score of 2-4, according to Ogilvie • Inoperable disease is defined as local tumor infiltration into surrounding organs, distant metastases or a poor general health due to serious concomitant disease - Written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: -Evidence of tumor growth within 2 cm of the upper esophageal sphincter -Tumor length > 12 cm -Previous stent placement for the same condition -Karnofsky performance scale of <40% -Patients unfit to undergo conscious sedation -Patients with a poor mental condition or mental retardation, unable to understand the nature and possible consequences of the study or unwilling to undergo follow-up assessments

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Composite clinical end point of recurrent dysphagia and major complications due to stent placement: - Recurrent dysphagia is defined as a dysphagia score of &#8805; 2 (according to Ogilvie) as a result of stent dysfunction after initial improvement of dysphagia to < 2. Stent dysfunction is defined as stent migration, tumor in- or overgrowth or food bolus impaction objectified during upper endoscopy. - Major complications due to stent placement are defined as complications leading to hospitalization, unintended prolongation of hospitalization, death or repeat endoscopic intervention with a possible or definite association with stent placement as determined by the treating physician

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
• Technical success; defined as ease of deployment and placement of the stent at the required location and verified by fluoroscopy and/or endoscopy. • Pain score during the first 14-days after stent placement; scored by the patient on a visual analogue scale (VAS). • Major complications not related to stent placement; defined as complications leading to hospitalization, unintended prolongation of hospitalization, death or repeat endoscopic intervention without a possible or definite association with stent placement as determined by the treating physician. • Minor complications due to stent placement; defined as minor complications with a possible or definite association with stent placement as determined by the treating physician. • Minor complications not related to stent placement; defined as minor complications without a possible or definite association with stent placement as determined by the treating physician. • Quality of life; measured with the EQ5D questionnaire.

Contacts

Public ContactW.F.W. Kappelle

P.O. box 85500 University Medical Center Utrecht Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology Room F02.618

w.f.w.kappelle@umcutrecht.nl+31 (0)88 5750724

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)