Skip to content

AVENIR project:: AGE in Vascular risk Estimation and Normalisation by Intensified Reduction in diabetes type 2.

AVENIR project:: AGE in Vascular risk Estimation and Normalisation by Intensified Reduction in diabetes type 2.

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON28161
Enrollment
800
Registered
2011-07-28
Start date
2011-08-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-02-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

diabetes mellitus type 2

Interventions

The aim of this implementation study is to investigate if the use of skin auto-fluorescence, provided tot the treating physician, will change his treatment policy. This will be tested by randomising

Sponsors

University Medical Center Groningen
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Type 2 diabetes mellitus, based on usual WHO (2005) or ADA (2010) criteria; 2. Age 25-65 years; 3. Stratification for presence of known preexisting CV complications or not.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Other conditions which may affect the interpretation of the UKPDS risk engine or skin autofluorescence measurements; 2. Persons from South Asian descent (UKPDS RE not valid in this group); 3. Diffuse skin disease especially on volar side lower arm (SAF measurement not valid); 4. Diseases threatening survival in short term; 5. Alcohol- or drug abuse; 6. (Recent, < 30 days) participation in another study; 7. No signed informed consent.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Differences in primary (one-year change in medication and in systolic blood pressure) will be compared between both arms.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Changes overall in HbA1c, LDL-cholesterol, skin autofluorescence (AGE reader), UKPDS risk score between baseline and one year; 2. Changes in UKPDS score and SAF from baseline to 1 year between the group in whom CV risk estimated with SAF and that estimated with the UKPDS risk engine is (higher or lower class) than that estimated with the UKPDS risk score, compared to the group in whom both rsisk estimated are concordant; 3. Differences between the concordant and discordant groups in target treatment values of blood pressure and lipids used by the treating physician. This will be assessed using a questionnaire.

Contacts

Public ContactA.J. Smit

University Medical Center Groningen U3.129

a.j.smit@umcg.nl+31 (0)50 3614854

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)