Skip to content

The effect of protein status on food preferences and intake.

The effect of protein status on food preferences and intake.

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON28076
Enrollment
40
Registered
2010-09-01
Start date
2010-09-27
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-02-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Eating behaviour

Interventions

Two 14-day fully controlled intervention periods differing in dietary protein intake. These interventions involve consumption of individualized, iso-energetic menus providing either 0.5 g protein/kg b

Sponsors

Wageningen University, Division of Human Nutrition
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Age: 18-35 years; 2. BMI: 20.0 - 25.0 kg/m2; 3. Healthy (as judged by the participant).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Restraint eating (men: score > 2.25; women: score > 2.80); 2. Lack of appetite; 3. Having difficulties with swallowing/eating; 4. Usage of a energy restricted diet during the last two months; 5. Weight loss or weight gain of 5 kg or more during the last two months; 6. Stomach or bowel diseases; 7. Kidney disorders; 8. Diabetes, thyroid disease, other endocrine disorders; 9. Prevalent cardiovascular disease; 10. A systolic blood pressure of ≥ 160 mmHg at screening; 11. Usage of daily medication other than birth control pills; 12. For women: pregnant or lactating; 13. Being a vegetarian; 14. Being allergic/intolerant for products under study; 15. Having participated in studies that have used the LFPQ: RiceTime, LunchTime, Smaak-Geur¯, SenSation, and ProStudy, or current participation in other research from the division of human nutrition (WUR).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The difference in protein intake (g) during a 2-day ad libitum-phase following the two interventions.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. The difference in energy intake during the 2-day ad libitum-phase following the two interventions; 2. The difference in subjective appetite ratings during the low protein diet and the high protein diet measured with a visual analogue scale (VAS) hourly during the waking hours of a single 24h period on the last day of the normal protein diet and on the first day and last day of the two interventions; 3. The difference on explicit liking (ratings on VAS), explicit wanting (ratings on VAS), implicit wanting (reaction time in food choice), and food preference (frequency) per food category between the 2 interventions measured with the LFPQ; 4. The difference in systolic blood pressure (measured at the end of each intervention) following the two interventions.

Contacts

Public ContactS. Griffioen-Roose

Wageningen University Division of Human Nutrition PO Box 8129

sanne.griffioen-roose@wur.nl+31 (0)317 485897

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)