Skip to content

Development and reliability study of the electronic, smartphone-administered, version of the paper-based Dutch Quality of Recovery-15 scale

Development and reliability study of the electronic, smartphone-administered, version of the paper-based Dutch Quality of Recovery-15 scale

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON27518
Enrollment
48
Registered
2021-04-26
Start date
2021-05-17
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-02-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

None

Sponsors

None
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Adult patients (>18 years old) who undergo elective gastrointestinal, orthopedic, gynecological, oral and maxillofacial, ear, nose and throat (ENT), traumatology, urological and neurosurgery under general anaesthesia will be included. All patient should own, and be able to use a smartphone. They are required to be able to provide written informed consent and for follow-up at the surgical ward, 24h postoperatively. Finally, patients need to complete both questionnaires correctly since the sample size calculation is based on complete pairs.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients will be excluded if they do not give informed consent, do not own or use a smartphone, return incomplete questionnaires, are admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) or the Postoperative Anaesthesia Care Unit (PACU) during the first night postoperatively (both scheduled or unscheduled); or if they have either poor Dutch comprehension, a psychiatric disturbance that precluded complete cooperation, a known history of alcohol or drug dependence, any severe preexisting medical condition that limited objective assessment after operation, any life-threatening postoperative complication or a postoperative delirium

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Intraclass correlation coefficient

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
- Internal consistency reliability - Patient’s preference for mode of administration: paper and pencil or electronically on their smartphone. - Correlation between the paper-based postoperative 100mm VAS and the digital equivalent.

Contacts

Public ContactJohan de Vlieger

Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen

j.c.n.de.vlieger@umcg.nl0505616161

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)