Skip to content

(Cost) Effectiveness of Surgery versus Prolonged Conservative Treatment in Patients with Intermittent Neurogenic Claudication caused by Lumbar Stenosis.

(Cost) Effectiveness of Surgery versus Prolonged Conservative Treatment in Patients with Intermittent Neurogenic Claudication caused by Lumbar Stenosis.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON27394
Enrollment
280
Registered
2010-02-17
Start date
2010-07-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-06-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lumbar stenosis Neurogenic claudication Surgical treatment Nonoperative treatment Lumbale kanaalstenose Neurogene claudicatio Chirurgische behandeling Non-operatieve behandeling

Interventions

A 6 months prolonged conservative treatment approach with a standardized exercise protocol, education/counseling by the general practitioner, prescription of analgesics and eventually delayed surgery

Sponsors

Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. At least 50 years old; 2. At least 3 months intermittent neurogenic claudication, as noted by leg/buttock/groin pain with or without back pain or fatigue in the legs provoked by walking. Leg/buttock/groin pain or fatigue needs to be strongly relieved when flexed such as when sitting in a chair; 3. Has a narrowed lumbar spinal canal, nerve root canal or intervertebral foramen at one or more levels confirmed by MRI; 4. Has a regular indication for surgical intervention of INC; 5. Informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Has a cauda equina syndrome defined as neural compression causing neurogenic bowel (rectal incontinence) or bladder dysfunction (bladder retention or incontinence); 2. Has Paget’s disease, severe osteoporosis or metastasis to the vertebrae; 3. Has significant scoliosis (Cobb angle > 25 degrees); 4. Has a Body Mass Index > 40 kg/m2; 5. Has previously had a laminectomy at the same level, has degenerative or lytic spondylolisthesis grade >1 (on a scale 1 to 4) at the affected level or has significant instability of the lumbar spine; 6. Has severe comorbid conditions that will increase the risk to the patient or interfere with the evaluability of this study (e.g. severe ischemic heart disease, musculoskeletal or neurological conditions impairing walking ability, cognitive impairment (MMSE <25 points); 7. Unable to read or write Dutch.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1. Zurich Claudication Questionnaire; 2. Shuttle walking test.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Demographic data; 2. Neurological/clinical investigations; 3. Modified Roland Disabilty Questionnaire; 4. Visual analogue scale (VAS) for Pain in back and leg; 5. Perceived Recovery; 6. SF-3630; 7. Societal costs and utilities (EuroQol-5D, visual analogue scale); 8. Complications; 9. Re-operation incidence; 10. Operative data; 11. Imaging findings; 12. Patient’s, neurologist’s, neurosurgeon’s, GP’s preference at baseline; 13. Timed-up and go test; 14. Short physical performance battery (SPPB); 15. MicroFET (Force Evaluating and Testing); 16. Grip strength; 17. Accelerometry.

Contacts

Public ContactG.M. Overdevest

Albinusdreef 2

g.m.overdevest@lumc.nl+31 (0)71 5262144

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)