Skip to content

Insulin combination therapy in type 2 diabetes.

Failure of metformin and sulfonylurea combination therapy: should we stop or continue the use of sulfonylurea in combination with insulin glargine in type 2 diabetes patients in primary care?

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON27312
Enrollment
200
Registered
2006-04-19
Start date
2006-04-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-02-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetes mellitus type 2

Interventions

Continuing sulfonylurea with a combination of metformin and insulin glargine versus discontinuing sulfonylurea with this combination.

Sponsors

De Stichting Julius Research
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Type 2 diabetes patients, male and female, insulin naive, without good glycaemic control for at least 3 months despite combination of metformin and sulfonylurea therapy and who are refererred for insulin therapy by their GP; 2. Age: 40-75 years; 3. HbA1c >=7,5%.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Type 1 diabetes; 2. C-peptide 2 times normal) and/or kidney (creatinin >135 male, > 110 female) problems; 4. Patients who do not read Dutch good enough to answer questionnaires; 5. Pregnancy/lactation; 6. Amputation (leg, arm); 7. Intercurrent disease at the discretion of the investigator; 8. Short life expectancy; 9. Contraindications/intolerancies for metformin, sulfonylurea or insulin glargine.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Difference between the two groups in the remaining insulin secretion of the beta-cells, assessed by the difference in HOMA-beta and in fasting C-peptide.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Difference in mean daily dosage of insulin glargine in order to reach good glycaemic control (HbA1c <= 7,0%); 2. Percentage of patients with good glycaemic control after 12 months; 3. Percentage of patients with good glycaemic controle at several intervals within 12 months; 4. Frequency of serious and of nocturnal hypoglycaemic episodes; 5. Waist circumference; 6. Quality of life; 7. Patients' treatment satisfaction.

Contacts

Public ContactM.J.P. Avendonk, van

University Medical Center Utrecht (UMCU), Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Stratenum 6.131, P.O. Box 85500

m.j.p.vanavendonk@umcutrecht.nl+31 (0)30 2538608

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)