How adolescents with disruptive behaviors think and feel.

Schema modes in referred adolescent boys with severe disruptive behaviors.

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Observational

Source

NL-OMON

Registry ID

NL-OMON26921

Enrollment

102

Registered

2018-05-02

Start date

2016-09-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-02-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Referred adolescent boys with severe disruptive behaviors.

Interventions

This study is a cross-sectional study, not involving any intervention. The participating adolescents will fill out three questionnaires and provide some basic demographic information (e.g. age, school

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria of the adolescents with disruptive behaviors: 1. The adolescent is a boy; 2. The adolescent is between 12 and 23 years old; 3. The adolescent meets the diagnostic criteria of a DSM-IV-TR or DSM-5 diagnosis of an oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) or conduct disorder (CD); 4. The adolescent has committed at least one criminal act. A community sample, consisting of adolescent boys who have been recruited at a secondary school, will serve as control group.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria of the adolescents with disruptive behaviors: 1. The adolescent has acute mental health problems that require an immediate psychiatric intervention; 2. The adolescent has insufficient mastery of the Dutch language. 3. The adolescent has insufficient cognitive abilities to fill out the questionnaires.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
The primary outcome of this study will consist of the externalising schema modes, as assessed with the 80-items version of the Schema Mode Inventory-research version (SMI-r; Lobbestael, van Vreeswijk, Spinhoven, Schouten, & Arntz, 2010; Keulen-de Vos et al., 2015).	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
The secondary outcomes of this study for both groups will include schemas of disconnection and rejection, as assessed with the Young Schema Questionnaire for Adolescents (YSQ-A; Van Vlierberghe, Rijkeboer, Hamers, & Braet, 2004). For the referred group, we will also include as a secondary outcome mental health problems, more specific disruptive behaviors, as assessed with the Dutch version of the Strenghts and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ; Goedhart, Treffers, & Van Widenfelt, 2003), and the internalising and healthy schema modes (SMI-r; Lobbestael, van Vreeswijk, Spinhoven, Schouten, & Arntz, 2010; Keulen-de Vos et al., 2015).	—

Measure

Time frame

The secondary outcomes of this study for both groups will include schemas of disconnection and rejection, as assessed with the Young Schema Questionnaire for Adolescents (YSQ-A; Van Vlierberghe, Rijkeboer, Hamers, & Braet, 2004). For the referred group, we will also include as a secondary outcome mental health problems, more specific disruptive behaviors, as assessed with the Dutch version of the Strenghts and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ; Goedhart, Treffers, & Van Widenfelt, 2003), and the internalising and healthy schema modes (SMI-r; Lobbestael, van Vreeswijk, Spinhoven, Schouten, & Arntz, 2010; Keulen-de Vos et al., 2015).

—

Contacts

Public ContactDorien Schilder

d.schilder@accare.nl

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)