Skip to content

Evaluation of two vaginal, uterussparing surgical methods for pelvic organ prolapse reconstruction: modified Manchester operation (MM) and sacrospinal hysteropexy (SSH).

Evaluation of two vaginal, uterussparing surgical methods for pelvic organ prolapse reconstruction: modified Manchester operation (MM) and sacrospinal hysteropexy (SSH).

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON26794
Enrollment
424
Registered
2018-01-29
Start date
2018-02-15
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-02-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

pelvic organ prolaps, POP, POP-Q, uterine prolaps, verzakking, baarmoederverzakking, uterusprolaps

Interventions

- SSH in which the uterus is attached to a fibrotic band in the pelvis (rightside sacrospinous ligament). - MM operation in which the cervix is partially removed and the uterus is supported by plicat

Sponsors

Radboudumc Nijmegen
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Uterine prolapse POP-Q stage 1 or 2 (POPQ point C </= +1cm)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: < 18 years Previous POP surgery Need or wish for removal of the uterus Pregnancy or future wish for childbearing Insufficient understanding and reading of the Dutch language Not capable of filling out questionnaires

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Primary outcome is a composite outcome (combination of anatomy, symptoms and re-interventions) 2 years after surgery.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary outcomes include surgery and hospital parameters, complications, pelvic floor dysfunctions, POP recurrence, further treatments, quality of life, costs.

Contacts

Public ContactKirsten Kluivers

Postbus 9101

sam@zorgevaluatienederland.nl+31 (0)24 3614727

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)