Skip to content

Immunochemical FOBT screening for colorectal cancer: yield and attendance for one- versus two-sample tests, and for second round screening with various intervals.

Immunochemical FOBT screening for colorectal cancer: yield and attendance for one- versus two-sample tests, and for second round screening with various intervals.

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON26711
Enrollment
12
Registered
2008-10-30
Start date
2008-05-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-02-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Colorectal cancer

Interventions

1-sample or 2-samples immunochemical FOBTs. Firstly, a representative population sample of 2.500 asymptomatic persons between 50-75 years of age in the region ‘Rijnmond’ will be invited for the 1st

Sponsors

Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Asymptomatic individuals aged 50-75 years old, who are able to provide an informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Inability or refusal to provide informed consent 2. History of CRC or inflammatory bowel disease 3. Severe or terminal disease, life expectancy less than 5 years 4. Colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy or contrast barium enema within the previous three years

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Adherence for second round CRC screening with 1-sample iFOBT (OC-Hemodia Latex) comparing annual, biennial, and triennial screening interval. Adherence and diagnostic yield of a first screening round comparing 1-sample versus 2-sample iFOBT screening.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The diagnostic yield of the various intervals of a second round iFOBT screening. The feasibility and required colonoscopy capacity needed for further evaluation of participants with a positive iFOBT screening. Side effects of screening. Participants’ experiences; the acceptability, satisfaction and burden of screening in different rounds and use of one or two-sample iFOBT. Reasons for non-participation. The cost-effectiveness ratio of the three different screenings-intervals and the one and two-sample iFOBT.

Contacts

Public ContactA.H.C. Roon, van

Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology

a.vanroon@erasmusmc.nl

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)