Eligible participants will be recruited at the participating sites. We aim to recruit 10 subjects at each site. For the site with patients with PDs, eligible participants are patients of > 18 years with PDs who are undergoing treatment at Scelta, GGNet in Apeldoorn. Based on a previous study (Oostendorp & Chakhssi, 2017), the study population can be described as predominantly female (over 80%) and with an average age of 25 years (SD = 7) at admission. All patients have one or more personality di
Conditions
Interventions
Sponsors
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: In order to be eligible to participate in this study on the site for PDs a subject must meet all of the following criteria: 1) is admitted to Scelta, GGNet, Apeldoorn, 2) has one or more DSM-5 personality disorders as primary diagnosis, 3) is aged between 18 and 65 years old, 4) has a high level of self-criticism at baseline (score FSCRS inadequate self > 20). In order to be eligible to participate in this study on the site for PTSD a subject must meet all of the following criteria: 1) is admitted to Team Complex Trauma, Dimence, Almelo, 2) has a DSM-5 PTSD disorders as primary diagnosis, 3) is aged between 18 and 65 years old, 4) has a high level of self-criticism at baseline (score FSCRS inadequate self > 20).
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Insufficient Dutch language proficiency to be able to participate in the study and complete the questionnaires.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| The primary outcome is the twice a week assessed level of self-critical beliefs. These beliefs are assessed before the baseline phase using the Dutch version of the Forms of Self-Criticizing/ Attacking and Self-Reassuring Scale (FSCRS; Sommers-Spijkerman et al., 2018). Each participant then chooses three to five self-critical beliefs, resulting from the questionnaire, which they consider to be central to their symptoms. Participants will rate each of their beliefs on a visual analog scale (VAS) from 0 to 100%. The self-critical beliefs are rated twice a week during baseline, treatment and follow-up phases. | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| PDs severity is assessed with the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Brief Form (PID-5-BF; American Psychological Association, 2013; Dutch version: Heijden et al., 2014). The PID-5-BF is a 25-item self-rated measure for maladaptive personality trait assessment. Each item can be rated on a 4-point scale (0 to 3). The overall measure has a range of scores from 0 to 75, with higher scores indicating greater overall personality dysfunction. The total score will be used as a measure for PD severity in the current study. The PID-5-BF has adequate reliability and validity (Anderson, Sellbom, & Salekin, 2016), which has been replicated in Dutch samples (Bastiaens et al., 2016). Self-compassion is assessed with the 12-item Self-Compassion Scale—Short Form (SCS-SF; Neff, 2003; Dutch version: Raes et al., 2011). The total score varies between 12 and 84, with higher scores reflecting higher levels of self-compassion. Previous research has shown that the Dutch version of the SCS-SF has adequate psychometric qualities (Raes et al., 2011). PTSD symptom severity is assessed with the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5; Weathers, Litz, Keane, Palmieri, Marx, & Schnurr, 2013; Dutch version: Boeschoten, Bakker, Jongedijk, & Olff, 2014). The PCL-5 is a 20 item (5 point Likert) self-report measure that assesses the 20 DSM-5 symptoms of PTSD. Total scores range from 0 to 80. Participants’ responses are indexed to the traumatic event that they identified as resulting in most self-criticism. The PCL-5 has demonstrated strong psychometric properties and high quality of efficiency for predicting PTSD diagnosis (Blevins, Weathers, Davis, Witte, & Domino, 2015). Research on the psychometric properties of the Dutch version of the PCL-5 is ongoing. Several studies have found good psychometric properties for the PCL-5, with good internal consistency (Bovin, Marx, Weathers, Gallagher, Rodriguez, et al., 2016; Sveen, Bondjers, Willebrand, 2016; Van der Meer, Bakker, Schrieken, Hoofwijk, & Olff, 2017) | — |
Contacts
GGNet Scelta