Skip to content

To what extent does high dose hemodiafiltration compared to high flux hemodialysis reduce risk of death in end stage kidney disease patients

An investigator initiated international, multi-centre, prospective, randomised, controlled study comparing high-dose Haemodiafiltration (HDF) versus conventional high-flux Haemodialysis (HD)

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON26477
Enrollment
1800
Registered
2018-04-13
Start date
2018-06-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-02-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

end stage kidney disease hemodialysis hemodiafiltration

Interventions

Usual care: Participants with ESKD who will be included will receive high-flux haemodialysis before randomisation. High-flux HD is defined as HD using high-flux dialysis membranes and bicarbonate base

Sponsors

University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: A participant must meet ALL of the following criteria in order to participate: 1. Signed and dated written Informed Consent Form obtained from the participant or his/her guardian or in accordance with local regulations. 2. Male or female aged ≥ 18 years. 3. Diagnosed with ESKD. 4. On HD treatment for ≥ 3 months. 5. Likely to achieve high-dose HDF (≥ 23 L session, in post-dilution mode), according to the protocol (Appendix I). 6. Willing to have a dialysis session with duration of ≥ 4 hours, three times a week. 7. Understands study procedures and is able to comply.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: A participant who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation: 1. Severe participant non-compliance defined as severe non-adherence to the dialysis procedure and accompanying prescriptions, especially frequency and duration of dialysis treatment. 2. Life expectancy < 3 months. 3. HDF treatment < 90 days before screening. 4. Anticipated living donor kidney transplantation < 6 months after screening. 5. Evidence of any other diseases or medical conditions that may interfere with the planned treatment, affect participant compliance or place the participant at high risk for treatment-related complications. 6. Participation in any other study will be discussed with and decided by the Executive Board depending on the extent of interference on CONVINCE . Registries are expected to be approved. 7. Unavailable ¡Ý 3 months during the study conduct for study visits.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary endpoint is defined as difference in rate for all-cause mortality, analysed as the difference in mortality rate between the two treatment arms.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The secondary endpoints are (1) Cause specific mortality (at least cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular death; others with high frequency may be added); (2) non-fatal and fatal cardiovascular events; (3) hospitalisation for infection-related conditions; (3) All cause hospitalisations; (4) PREMS and PROMS; and (5) Cost effectiveness.

Contacts

Public ContactP.J. Blankestijn

University Medical center Utrecht (UMCU), HP F03.223, P.O. Box 85500

P.J.Blankestijn@umcutrecht.nl+31-88-7557336

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)