Skip to content

Design of a randomized controlled ACL injury prevention study.

Design of a randomized controlled ACL injury prevention study.

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON26424
Enrollment
90
Registered
2010-03-19
Start date
2010-09-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-02-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Prevention of ACL injuries

Interventions

Two types of immediate feedback will be given: Explicit feedback: After performing the sidestep cutting manoeuvres, subjects will immediately receive explicit instructions to improve their performanc
2. Decreased knee flexion angle
3. Increased anterior tibial shear force
4. Decreased hip flexion angle
5. Increased hip internal rotation angle
6. Increased knee internal rotation angle. Items to improve these potential risk factors above will be mentioned to the subjects and subjects will be requested to minimise the load at the knee. Imp
they explore and then select the performance which fits best.

Sponsors

University Medical Center Groningen Center for Human Movement Sciences University of Groningen
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. 18 years or older; 2. Playing basketball at the highest recreational level; 3. No history of major lower extremity injury or surgery; 4. No current or recent (6 months) injury to the entire lower extremity; 5. Able to participate in training and games for 100% at time of testing.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Any hip, knee or other relevant injury in the last 6 months prior to testing; 2. Any relevant previous injury or surgery at any joint of the lower extremity; 3. Any history of neurological, vestibular or visual impairment.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary outcome measurements will be as follows: 1. Average EMG pattern of the gluteus maximus (GM), vastus medialis (VM), vastus lateralis (VL), medial hamstring (MH), lateral hamstring (LH), medial gastrocnemius (MG) and lateral gastrocnemius (LG); 2. Muscle onset time (ie. the first burst in EMG as detected by the Santello algoritm prior to landing [68]) of the GM, VM, VL, MH, LH, MG and LG; 3. Muscle activity of the GM, VM, VL, MH, LH, MG and LG integrated over the interval from 100 milliseconds prior to foot contact to foot contact (preparatory interval) and from foot contact to the point of peak knee flexion (weight acceptance); 4. Muscle co-contraction (ie. using the integrated EMG of each muscle and the formula: [(less active muscle/more active muscle) X (sum of the integrated activity of both muscles)]73) of VL-MG, VL-LH, VM-LG and VM-MH over the interval from 100 milliseconds prior to foot contact to foot contact (preparatory interval) and from foot contact to the point of peak knee flexion (weight acceptance); 5. Hip, knee and ankle angles at IC, peak posterior GRF and the maximum values for each of those variables: A. Abduction / adduction; B. Flexion / extension; C. External / internal rotation (only for hip and knee); D. Knee angular displacement flexion angle. 6. Joint moments of hip, knee and ankle at IC, peak posterior GRF and the maximum values for each of those variables: A. Abduction / adduction; B. Flexion / extension; C. External / internal rotation (only for hip and knee). 7. Peak vertical GRF (normalized to body weight); 8. Peak proximal anterior tibial shear force (normalized to body weight).

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. The history on injuries and / or surgeries; 2. The Tegner activity level questionnaire; 3. Activity between intervention and follow up tests.

Contacts

Public ContactAnne Benjaminse

Antonius Deusinglaan 1

a.benjaminse@med.umcg.nl+31 (0)50 3639148

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)