FindTrial
Sign In

Computer Assisted Surgery versus conventional arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament reconstruction – a prospective randomised clinical trial.

Computer Assisted Surgery versus conventional arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament reconstruction – a prospective randomised clinical trial.

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON26161
Enrollment
90
Registered
2007-01-15
Start date
2006-12-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-02-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anterior cruciate ligament rupture

Interventions

Arthroscopic ACL reconstruction, randomised in 45 conventional (usual care), and 45 CAS.

Sponsors

None listed

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. All patients with an ACL rupture who are indicated for a reconstruction; 2. Age >18 yrs.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients who are unable to understand Dutch written language; 2. Patients who are unable to follow the regular postoperative controls.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Planned tunnel position versus actual achieved tunnel position of the ACL transplant (by CT)—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. difference in change in IKDC 2. difference in change in KOOS 3. difference in change in knee pain (VAS for pain) 4. difference in change in knee complaints (Lysholm score) 5. difference in change in sport activity (Tegner score) 6. difference in change in objective instability of the knee (KT1000) 7. difference in change in objective muscle strenght (Biodex) 8. difference satisfaction of the treatment—

Contacts

Public ContactD.E. Meuffels

PO Box 2040

d.meuffels@erasmusmc.nl0031-10-4635088

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)