Clinical efficacy of Remote continuous Monitoring supplementary to intermittent monitoring compared to intermittent monitoring on a surgical ward in a large Teaching hospital in the Netherlands

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

NL-OMON

Registry ID

NL-OMON26077

Enrollment

285

Registered

2021-05-25

Start date

2021-06-22

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-06-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

surgical, gastroenterology and gynaecological oncology surgical admissions on a general ward

Interventions

supplementory remote continuous monitoring provided by a wireless patch, worn on the patients chest, with data transmitted wirelessly every 2 minutes to a mobile device carried by the patients nurse e

thus, the continuous monitor functions as an organization's "safety net" for deteriorating inpatients in between the intermittent monitoring of vital signs in the afferent limb of the RRS.

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: at least 18 years old; surgical, gastroenterology and gynaecological oncology surgical admissions; expected length of stay > 24 h; informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: An allergy to skin adhesives, wound or skin lesion near the application site, patients with a pacemaker or implantable cardioverter defibrillator, patients in a palliative trajectory, patients waiting for placement in a nursery home.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
total length of hospital stay	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
cardiac arrests, mortality, unplanned ICU admissions, 30-day readmission, RRT calls, experience patients, experience care professionals, alarmfatigue	—

Contacts

Public ContactRKL So

Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht

r.so@asz.nl078-542675

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)