Skip to content

Comparing preoperatively planned alignment with postoperatively achieved alignment

Shapematching study of Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON26012
Enrollment
26
Registered
2013-10-04
Start date
2013-10-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-02-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Partial knee arthroplasty, accuracy, CT controlled, patient specific guides

Interventions

patient specific femoral and tibial positioning guides are developed from MRI. The guides are made of polyamide and are disposable. The system fits the femoral and tibial components independently, is

Sponsors

Department of Orthopedic Surgery Orbis Medisch Centrum, Sittard-Geleen, The Netherlands
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: -Patients scheduled to undergo primary UKA replacement with any of the following indications - Painful and disabled knee joint resulting from osteoarthritis of the medial knee compartment. - High need to obtain pain relief and improve function -Above 18 years old (full skeletal maturity). -Body-mass-index (BMI) <35 -Ability and willingness to follow instructions, including control of weight and activity level, and to return for follow-up evaluations. -Consent form read, understood and signed by patient.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: -Patients with osteoarthritis of more than only the medial knee compartment -Active infection in knee -General infection -Distant foci of infections which may spread to the implant site -Failure of previous joint replacement -Pregnancy -Previous major knee surgery, except for arthroscopic meniscectomy. -Metal near knee joint (MRI-scan not possible) -Not able or willing to undergo MRI-scan and CT-scan -Reumatoid arthritis -Extension deficit of more than 15 degrees -Flexion less than 110 degrees. -Non-correctable varus axis -Cruciate ligament insufficiency

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To compare the preoperatively planned, computer-based Signature™ alignment plan with the actual achieved alignment in the frontal, coronal and sagittal plane in vivo postoperatively of both the femur and tibia components of the partial knee arthroplasty.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Verify the fit, form and practical use of the Signature™ alignment guides. Shape-matching: To determine the occurrence (and percentage) of outliers in alignment in the frontal, sagittal and horizontal plane of femoral and tibial components. Outliers are defined as deviations > 3 degrees from preoperative planning. Shape-matching:To determine the occurrence (and percentage) of outliers in alignment of the mechanical axis of the leg. Outliers are defined as deviations > 3 degrees from preoperative planning. Shape-matching: Verify to what extend the thickness of the in vivo inserted polyethylene corresponds with the pre-operatively calculated thickness of this insert. Shape matching: To compare the pre operatively planned alignment of the prosthesis as determined by software and based on the MRI-scan with the actual postoperative alignment of the prosthesis placed with Signature™ in the frontal, transverse and sagittal plane (accurateness of the guides).

Contacts

Public ContactM.G.M. Schotanus

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Orbis Medisch Centrum dr H vd Hoffplein 1

m.schotanus@orbisconcern.nl+31 (0)88 4597823

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)