Skip to content

Functional Outcome of Vanguard XP vs CR: a single centre RCT using three dimensional fluoroscopic analysis

Functional Outcome of Vanguard XP vs CR: a single centre RCT using three dimensional fluoroscopic analysis

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON25871
Enrollment
40
Registered
2015-12-11
Start date
2015-10-12
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-02-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Patients receiving a primary total knee with a functional anterior cruciate ligament.

Interventions

Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either the cruciate retaining or bicruciate retaining TKA both of which are commercially available and have a CE mark (Vanguard System, Biomet, Inc.,

Sponsors

Sint Maartenskliniek
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: • Patient with non-inflammatory knee osteoarthritis, which is confirmed by radiology. • Osteoarthritis is unilateral or bilateral with the contralateral knee functioning properly, not operated on in the last 6 months and not planned for TKA in the coming 2 years. • Patient is set to receive a primary cemented total knee arthroplasty. • Age between 40 and 75 years, inclusive, on the day of the operation. • Patient plans to be available for follow-up until two years post-operative. • Patient is in stable health (ASA-score &#8804; 3) and is free of or treated for cardiac, pulmonary, haematological, or other conditions that would pose excessive operative risk. • Patient has a correctable or <10° rigid (non-correctable) varus or valgus deformity of the knee. • Participants must be able to give informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: • Patient has a BMI > 35. • Patient's expected physical activity after surgery is 2 or less on the UCLA Activity Scale. • Patient has had previous hip replacement surgery in the last 6 months, or is planned to have a hip replacement in the next 6-12 months (because of the effect on function). • Patient has had major, non-arthroscopic surgery to the study knee, including HTO. • Patient has an active, local infection or systemic infection • Prior high-energy trauma to the affected knee or prior history of anterior and/or posterior cruciate ligament rupture. • Suspicion of anterior and/or posterior cruciate ligament rupture at clinical examination. • Documented osteoporosis with patient in active medical treatment. • Patient has physical, emotional or neurological conditions that would compromise compliance with post-operative rehabilitation and follow-up. • Bone quality compromised by disease or infection which cannot provide adequate support and/or fixation to the prosthesis • Severe instability of the knee joint secondary to the absence of collateral ligament integrity and function • Patient has knee flexion 10 degrees (passive extension lag) • Patient has > 30 degrees extension deficit (active restraint to extension) • Patient does not have a proper functioning patella tendon on the affected side; measured as inability of active extension of the knee • Patient has quadriceps weakness on the affected side; score on MRC scale < 4 measured by research nurse • Patient has rheumatoid arthritis, any auto-immune disorder, immunosuppressive disorder or a terminal illness.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To quantify the kinematics during functional tests the posterior femoral rollback (i.e. translation) in mm from 30° flexion to 0° extension during the step-up test will be measured. The endpoint of this parameter is set at one year post-operative.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
• The kinematics during functional tests are also quantified by measuring the total anterior femoral rollback in mm from 0° extension to 90° flexion during the lunge test. • 3D migration (i.e. translation and rotation) in mm of the tibial and femoral component of the implant referenced to the bone. • Lateral femoral lift-off in mm at 90° knee flexion during lunge test. • AP laxity of the knee in 20° and 90°, in mm from anterior to posterior using a rolimeter • Functional power output of the leg using the Leg extension power rig. • Patient and Clinician Reported Outcome Measures (PROMS and CROMS)

Contacts

Public ContactM.R. Benard

Sint Maartenskliniek Nijmegen

m.benard@maartenskliniek.nl+31 (0)24 3659396

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)