Skip to content

Patients’ preferences for esophageal cancer screening strategies

Patients’ preferences for esophageal cancer screening strategies a choice-based conjoint analysis

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON25816
Enrollment
400
Registered
2018-02-26
Start date
2018-04-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-02-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

esophageal cancer Barrett's esophagus

Interventions

Choice-based conjoint analysis (CBC) CBC analyses involve surveys in which respondents are asked to choose between hypothetical alternatives defined by a set of differing attributes. The method is ba

Sponsors

Radboud university medical center
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: In order to be eligible to participate in this study, a subject must meet all of the following criteria: - The subjects is aged 50-74 years old. - The subject is randomly selected from the municipal database of Nijmegen

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: - The subject is illiterate. - The subject has been previous diagnosed with Barrett’s esophagus or esophageal cancer. - The subjects has a history of esophageal or gastric resection or surgery which has changed the esophageal anatomy. - Patients with prior history of ablation (photodynamic therapy, radiofrequency ablation, cryotherapy, argon plasma coagulation) or endoscopic mucosal resection. - The subject is unable to provide informed consent.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The main endpoint of this study is the relative importance of the selected attributes in the CBC analysis, expressed in the utility of each individual attribute. Utilities indicate how much the difference between the levels of one attribute affects the decision of a subject to take part in a screening program.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Expected utility scores for existing screening methods. This is the expected utility for an existing screening method for EAC, which can be calculated by applying its current characteristics to the utility function. - Expected uptake of EAC screening using various screening methods. - Differences in preference structures among subgroups in the population. - Willingness To Pay.

Contacts

Public ContactYonne Peters

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (455)

y.peters@radboudumc.nl+31615956464

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)