Day-time urinary incontinence (DUI) and non-retentive faecal incontinence (NFI)
Conditions
Interventions
Video-modelling (VM)
Response Restriction (RR) with prompting
Standard Urotherapy (SU)
Sponsors
SeysCentra
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: All participants meet the following inclusionary criteria: They (a) have DUI, assessment and diagnosis using ICCS criteria (von Gontard, 2013b; Austin et al., 2016), and/or (b) have NFI, assessment and diagnosis using Rome IV criteria (von Gontard, 2013a; Hyams et al., 2016), (c) underwent a paediatric examination (d) have an IQ =35, (e) have ability to stand and walk, have (f) no visual impairment, (g) have the ability to imitate, and (h) SU training at SeysCentra has already been conducted, and did not result in continence
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Participants will be excluded from this research study based on the following exclusion criteria: They (a) have an IQ = 34, (b) are unable to stand or walk, (c) have a visual impairment, (d) are unable to imitate based on video modelling imitation probes, (e) do not have NFI or DUI or (f) received a completed SU training according to the ICCS criteria (von Gontard, 2013b) at a different facility, or (g) completed an SU training which was effective in attaining continence.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| self-initiated toileting and urinary/faecal accidents during treatment/post-intervention | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| self-initiated toileting and urinary/faecal accidents during follow-up. | — |
Contacts
Public ContactMaayke van Galen
Radboud Universiteit/SeysCentra
Outcome results
None listed