Skip to content

Mycophenolate sodium vs Everolimus or Ciclosporin with Allograft Nephropathy as Outcome.

A prospective, open, randomized, multicenter study comparing the effects of everolimus versus mycophenolate sodium as compared to ciclosporin as maintenance therapy in renal allograft recipients, on chronic allograft damage and cardiovascular parameters.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON25640
Enrollment
255
Registered
2006-01-17
Start date
2004-01-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-02-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

prospective, open, randomized multicenter

Interventions

By achieving stable state 6 months after renal transplantation a baseline renal allograft biopsy is performed and randomisation in one of the three arms of the study takes place. Arm 1: prednisolon
Arm 2 : prednisolon and AUC guided mycophenolate mofetil sodium treatment
Arm 3: prednisolon and AUC guided everolimus treatment. All treatment arm have a duration of 18 month whereafter a final renal allograft biopsy is performed. It has to be noted that for the 3 treatme

Sponsors

MECANO Steering group Chair: S.Surachno/F.Bemelman
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. First or second renal transplant; 2. Female or male 18-70 years; 3. Cadaveric or non-HLA identical living donor; 4. Understands risks and purpose of study; 5. written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Double kidney transplants, kidney-pancreas transplants, 3rd or 4th transplant; 2. PRA > 50% historic or current; 3. Pregnancy or unwilling to use contraception during the study; 4. Cholesterol > 8,5 mmol/l; 5. History of therapy resistance against HMG co-reductase inhibitors.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Degree of inflammation and fibrosis and degree of arteriolar hyalinosis in renal biopsies taken at 6 and 24 months after implantation.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Vascular assesments by IMT and M-mode of carotis interna; 2. Bloodpressure and number of antihypertensive drugs; 3. Lipid profile; 4. Renal allograft survival and function; 5. Patient survival; 6. Incidence of malignancies; 7. Infectious complications.

Contacts

Public ContactS. Surachno

Academic Medical Center (AMC), Renal transplant unit, P.O. Box 22660

s.surachno@amc.uva.nl+31 (0)20 5664170 / +31 (0)20 5669111

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)