Skip to content

MYCHOICE: The MYoma treatment Comparison study: High intensity image guided fOcused ultrasound versus standard (minimally) Invasive fibroid care - a (Cost) Effectiveness analysis

MYCHOICE: The MYoma treatment Comparison study: High intensity image guided fOcused ultrasound versus standard (minimally) Invasive fibroid care - a (Cost) Effectiveness analysis

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON25568
Enrollment
240
Registered
2020-08-31
Start date
2020-11-25
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-06-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Uterine fibroids, myomas, uterus myomatosus

Interventions

The intervention group will receive Magnetic Resonance image guided High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (MR-HIFU) The control group can choose between standard care treatment, including: hysterectomy,

Sponsors

Isala Hospital Zwolle
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: • Symptomatic fibroids warranting (minimally) invasive treatment i.e. either hysterectomy, myomectomy or UAE; • Conservative treatment failed or is undesired; • Premenopausal; • =18 years of age; • Eligible for MR-HIFU treatment.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: • Asymptomatic fibroids; • Post-menopausal; • BMI of =35kg/m2 and/or abdominal subcutis =4cm; • >5 uterine fibroids unless 1 or 2 fibroids causing the symptoms can be clearly identified; • MRI-contraindications or contrast allergy; • Current pregnancy; • Active child wish defined as desire for a pregnancy within one year after inclusion. These women will be excluded, because there is not yet consensus about the standard of care for these women. Women without active child wish but for whom a pregnancy in the future is not ruled out, can be included in the study; • Suspicion of malignancy; • Dominant adenomyosis, defined as more volume of adenomyosis rather than fibroids; • Not willing to undergo pre-treatment with Leuproreline (Lucrin) before MR-HIFU in case of a uterine fibroid with a diameter >10cm or classified as Funaki 3; • Not willing to remove an interfering intra-uterine contraception device (Mirena) prior to MR-HIFU; • Not willing or able to give informed consent; • Not eligible for MR-HIFU as determined by the multidisciplinary MR-HIFU team in Isala based on a screening MRI: - Uterine fibroid(s) classified with FIGO classification 0-1 or 8 or with a diameter 12cm even after use of manipulation techniques; - Calcified uterine fibroids or fibroids without contrast enhancement.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1.Quality of life (QoL) at the follow-up time point of 24 months after treatment; 2.Costs consisting of: direct health care costs, costs due to loss of productivity and patient costs.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
-Adverse events/complications; -Length hospital stay; -Peri/post procedural pain; -Patient treatment preference and satisfaction; -(Co)-medication; -Re-interventions; -Onset menopause; -Reproductive outcomes; -Non perfused volume, fibroid shrinkage.

Contacts

Public ContactMartijn Boomsma

Isala Hospital

mychoice@isala.nl0031 88 624 5000

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)