Blind versus Ultrasound-guided Radius Reduction STudy

Will ultrasound guided reduction of distal radius fractures lead to less reduction attempts compared to the blind reduction technique?

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

NL-OMON

Registry ID

NL-OMON25424

Enrollment

214

Registered

2019-08-05

Start date

2018-01-12

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-05-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Distal radius fracture Distal radial fracture, distal radius fracture, ultrasound, PoCUS, closed reduction

Interventions

Echo

Eligibility

Age

16 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patiënten (=16 jaar) die zich op de SEH presenteren met een distale radiusfractuur (inclusief intra-articulaire fracturen of radiusfracturen in combinatie met een distale ulna fractuur) waarvoor repositie geïndiceerd is.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: - Leeftijd <16 jaar - Open fracturen - Klinisch vastgestelde nieuwe neurovasculaire schade - Operatie indicatie gesteld op basis van de eerste röntgenfoto - Osteosynthese materiaal in situ bij aangedane pols - Letsel waardoor applicatie van echo gel niet mogelijk is

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
A 50% reduction in repeated reduction attempts of distal radius fractures between the ultrasound guided group and the control group.	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
The difference between both groups in the number of patients that need reduction in operating theater, the difference in reduction time in ED between both groups.	—

Contacts

Public ContactSvenja Haak

MCL

Svenja.Haak@znb.nl

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)