Skip to content

Developing a new test for ability to control an arm prosthesis.

Comparing tests for myocontrol before, during and after training to determine the underlying mechanism.

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON25334
Enrollment
15
Registered
2015-12-13
Start date
2015-12-14
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-02-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

This experiment will be executed with healthy subjects.

Interventions

During this study all subject will undergo two tests. One of these tests will be executed with the use of a myoelectric prosthesis simulator. The other test will be executed in a virtual environment,

Sponsors

University Medical Centre Groningen (UMCG) A. Deusinglaan 1 9713 AV Groningen The Netherlands
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: The subjects included in this study are able bodied and right handed, with normal or corrected to normal vision. Both male and female subject will be included. All subjects included will be between 18 and 50 years of age.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Subjects with (history of) pain or musculoskeletal impairments of the arms or upper body will not be included. The same accounts for subjects with prior experience in the use of myoelectric devices and subjects younger than 18 or older than 50.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Primary outcome measure per test; 1.Serious game: Adaptive catching; the plateau phase of the aperture of the gripper in the game (grasping profile) and he difference between the aperture of the virtual gripper and the diameter of three differently sized virtual balls a.Prosthesis task: Compressible objects; Duration of maximum hand aperture (i.e., plateau phase, goniometer) and the number of millimeters the compressible objects are compressed. The above described measures will be ranked per test. These ranks will be analyzed.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary outcome measures; 1. Adaptive catching a. Number of bounced objects b. Accuracy. This is defined as the total number of items caught divided by the number of object that reached the bottom of the screen (dropped and missed objects). 2. Compressible objects a. Aperture of the hand b. Opening velocity c. Closing velocity

Contacts

Public ContactA. Heerschop

Center for Human Movement Sciences-UMCG, University of Groningen. Building-Room 3216-213

a.heerschop@umcg.nl+31 (0) 50 363 8902 // +31 (0) 6 44103626

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)