hemodialysis, end stage renal disease (ESRD), fistula, patency, steal, thrombosis dialyse, nierfalen, av-fistel,
Conditions
Interventions
Vena basilica transposition versus brachiocubiti fistula.
Sponsors
Dr AC vd Ham, vascular surgeon Sint Franciscus Gasthuis Rotterdam
Dr JHM Tordoir, vascular surgeon Ac ziekenhuis Maastricht
Dr AAEAde Smet, vascular surgeon Maastadziekenhuis Rotterdam
Dr MPFM Vrancken Peeters, vascular surgeon Erasmus Medisch Centrum Rotterdam
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: 1. Failing fore-arm fistula; 2. No options for fore-arm fistula ( venous and arterial diameter < 2 mm ); 3. Mean diameter of vena basilica and vena cephalica and arteria brachialis of 3 or more mm.
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: 1. Locoregional or systemic infection; 2. Not being able to give informed consent; 3. Ischemia of ipsilateral arm.
Design outcomes
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| 1. Is there a difference in thrombosis-free interval; 2. Is there a difference in the amount of interventions needed; 3. Is there a difference in usability, related to: duration untill first cannulation, total time of non-usability as a result of revision operations, easy cannulation, hemostasis after cannulation, hematoma, infection, steal, aneurysm, oedema; 4. Effect of the fistula on peripheral circulation. | — |
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Is there a difference in primary patency after one year in vena basilica transposition compared with brachiocubiti fistula for chronic hemodialysis. | — |
Contacts
Public ContactELBA Trial study center
Sint Franciscus Gasthuis, secretary surgery department, Postbus 10900
Outcome results
None listed