Is there a difference in outcome between PIP- resection- arthroplasty and PIP- arthrodesis in correcting symptomatic claw toes?

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

NL-OMON

Registry ID

NL-OMON25113

Enrollment

100

Registered

2008-10-28

Start date

2008-11-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-02-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

General population with symptomatic rigid claw toes

Interventions

Correction of the proximal interphalangeal joint (PIP) with two different surgical methods: 1. PIP- arthrodesis 2. PIP- resection- arthroplasty

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: - Every patient, between 20 and 85 years old, with symptomatic rigid claw toes, with an indication for surgical intervention; after failure of conservative therapy. The PIP joint needs to be rigid.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Previous surgical interventions of toes/ forefoot (except for hallux) 2. Simultaneous surgical intervention of the foot, except for toe surgery 3. Specific comorbidity: arterial insufficiency, Complex Regional Pain Syndrome, diabetes mellitus, neuropathy, ongoing infectie, HMSN, congenital disorders, SLE - General joint impairment (ie. reumatoïd arthritis, poly-arthritis) - Pre-existent limited mobility as result of different pathology (ie. hemiplegia, amputation)

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
- Foot function, graded by a validated out come tool: AOFAS score	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
- Foot Function Index - Mobility - Physical examination - SF-36 - Vas pain score	—

Contacts

Public ContactJ.C.M. Schrier

+31 (0)6 18515625

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)