Skip to content

NEglect Assessment in geriatric Rehabilitation

NEglect Assessment in geriatric Rehabilitation

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON24985
Enrollment
100
Registered
2020-10-26
Start date
2020-10-05
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-02-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Interventions

Part I: Stroke patient: Two pen and paper tasks (star cancellation and line bisection) and one observation scale (Catherine bergego scale) Part 2: - stroke patient: two pen and paper tasks (star can
Zarit burden interview short form)) and interview

Sponsors

LUMC, Zorggroep Florence
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: The study population consist of 100 stroke patients consecutively admitted to GR settings affiliated with the UNC-ZH in a six month period or longer when needed. Inclusion criteria stroke patients part I of the NeAR study: In order to be eligible to participate in this study, a subject must meet the following criteria: - Confirmed stroke in hospital (transfer papers) - Admitted to geriatric rehabilitation with a DBC CVA Inclusion criteria stroke patients and caregivers part II of the NeAR studie: - Stroke patient: In order to be eligible to participate in this study, a subject must be a former GR stroke patient (VSN or non VSN) who participated in part I of the NeAR study, and living together with an informal caregiver. - Caregiver: In order to be eligible to participate in this study, a caregiver must living together with the participating stroke patient (partner, family or other).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria stroke patients part I of the NeAR study: A potential subject who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation in this study: - Insufficient communication and comprehension (not English or Dutch speaking) - Abnormal or not corrected visual acuity - Not competent to give informed consent (screened by treating physician) - Not able to participate physically or cognitively (screened by treating physician) Exclusion criteria stroke patients an caregivers part II of the NeAR study: A potential subject (stroke patient) who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation in this study: - Insufficient communication and comprehension (not English or Dutch speaking) - Not a good or not corrected vision - Not competent to give informed consent (already screened by treating physician) - Not able to participate physically or cognitively - Aphasia (in contrast to the first part, patients will be participating in an interview) A potential subject (caregiver) who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation in this study: - Insufficient communication and comprehension (not English or Dutch speaking)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Primary objectivespart I of the NeAR study: A.To investigate the feasibility of VSN assessments within the first two weeks after admission inpatient GR, in terms of the following variables: percentage of attended and completed assessments, patients time to complete and experienced barriers and facilitating factors for involved professionals and patients. B.To estimate the proportion of VSN (severity) after stroke during inpatient GR admittance. Primary objectives part II of the NeAR strudy A.To investigate the impact of VSN on patient participation (i.e. involvement in a life situation), six months after admission inpatient GR, when people returned home. B.To investigate the impact of VSN on informal caregiver burden, six months after admission inpatient GR, when people returned home.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary objectives part I of the NeAR study: C. To identify which demographics (e.g. age, sex, level of education) and stroke characteristics (e.g. severity of stroke, side of lesion) are associated with VSN and VSN severity. D. To investigate whether and to what extent outcomes of the various VSN tests differ with respect to VSN outcomes (e.g. numbers of positive/negative VSN outcomes, outcomes by degree of VSN severity). Secundary objectives part II of the NeAR study: None

Contacts

Public ContactMartine Bosma

LUMC

m.kant-bosma@lumc.nl06 - 36 24 12 67

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)