Skip to content

Treatment decisions in collarbone fractures

Shared decision making in the treatment of clavicular fractures: daily practice or goal for the future?

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON24846
Enrollment
50
Registered
2014-12-31
Start date
2014-12-15
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-02-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

clavicular fracture, shared decision making, clavicula

Interventions

All patients fill out a questionnaire once (SDM-Q-9-NL, Control Preferences Scale and additional questions).

Sponsors

University Medical Center Leiden (LUMC), Leiden, The Netherlands
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: - midshaft, displaced clavicular fracture type Robinson 2A2 or 2B - age between 18 and 70 years - able to understand dutch

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: - absolute operation indication (e.g. neurovascular damage, compromised skin). - reasons that rule out shared decision making (e.g. follow up in other hospital, inoperability)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Degree of perceived participation in treatment decision making in patients with midshaft, displaced clavicular fractures (measured with SDM-Q-9-NL)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
- Satisfaction of patients with their role in treatment decision making (measured with Control Preferences Scale) - Awareness of the treatment options at the start of the consultation. Do patients have a clear preference for one treatment option before the start of the consultation and if so, has it changed after the consultation? (measured with additional questions)

Contacts

Public ContactSarah Woltz
s.woltz@lumc.nl

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)