Skip to content

Schema therapy for older adults with borderline personality disorder

The effectiveness of individual schema therapy in older adults with borderline personality disorder: a multiple-baseline study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON24830
Enrollment
10
Registered
2018-03-11
Start date
2017-08-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-02-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Schema therapy, Older adults, Personality disorder, Borderline

Interventions

This study is a multiple baseline design.The design consists of three phases. First, a baseline phase varying in length from four to eight weeks in which core beliefs are identified. No therapeutic
Arntz & van Genderen, 2011) and participants case conceptualization. The third and final phase is a follow-up phase which lasts six months and includes monthly booster sessions in which the aim is to

Sponsors

TRANZO, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences Professor Cobbenhagenlaan 125, 5037 DB, Tilburg
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria are a primary diagnosis of BPD, increased scores on the traits negative affectivity, disinhibition, and psychoticism of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5), absence of chronic somatic comorbidity which seriously affects daily life functioning, minimum age of 60 years and willingness to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria are severe depression, bipolar disorder, psychotic disorder (other than transient stress-related psychosis, if this overlaps with criterion 9 of BPD), IQ under 80, substance dependence that needs clinical detoxification and neurocognitive disorder expressed by a MMSE-score below 25.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary outcome measure is the weekly assessed strength of idiosyncratic beliefs. These beliefs are evoked by a semi-structured procedure during the baseline phase. Each participant formulates three to five idiosyncratic dysfunctional beliefs they believe to be central to their personality disorder. Participants will rate the degree they believe each statement on a visual analogue scale (VAS) from 0 to 100% credibility.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Quality of life is assessed by the Dutch WHOQOL-BREF (Trompenaars, Masthoff, Van Heck, Hodiamont, & De Vries, 2005). The WHOQOL-BREF is a self-report measure that consists of 26 items, which are rated on a 5-point Likert scale. Research in two samples of older adults, with mean ages of 73 and 76 years, showed good reliability and satisfactory construct validity (Low, Molzahn, & Kalfoss, 2008). Psychological distress is measured by the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI; Derogatis, & Melisaratos, 1983). The BSI is 53-item self-report measure, which is rated on a 5-point rating scale. The reliability and validity of the BSI are good, with reliability coefficients ranging from .68 to .91 (Morian & Tan, 1998), and the Dutch version of the BSI has been validated in older adults (de Beurs, 2011) Early maladaptive schemas are measured with the Dutch Young Schema Questionnaire (YSQ; Sterk, & Rijkeboer, 1997). The questionnaire consists of 16 subscales and includes 205 items, which are phrased as negative core beliefs and rated along a 6-point Likert scale. In a clinical sample with a mean age of 33.9 years (range 18-74) the YSQ showed good reliability and convergent and discriminant validity (Rijkeboer & Van Den Bergh, 2006). The YSQ measures EMS scales equally across age (Pauwels, Dierckx, & Claes, 2014). Schema modes are assessed by the Dutch Short Schema Mode Inventory (Lobbestael, van Vreeswijk, Spinhoven, Schouten, & Arntz, 2010). It consists of 14 subscales and includes 118 items which must be rated on a 6-point Likert scale. This questionnaire has acceptable internal consistencies (Cronbach α’s from .79 to .96) and moderate construct validity (Lobbestael, van Vreeswijk, Spinhoven, Schouten, & Arntz, 2010). Current severity of BPD is assessed with the Dutch version of the BPDSI (Arntz et al., 2003), a semi-structured interview which assesses the frequency and severity of BPD symptoms during the last three months. The BPDSI consists of nine sections, one for each o

Contacts

Public ContactDavid Khasho
d.khasho@ggzbreburg.nl+31 (0)6 474 08223

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)