Skip to content

PROstate cancer follow-up care in Secondary and Primary hEalth Care: PROSPEC study.

A randomized study, PROstate cancer follow-up care in Secondary and Primary hEalth Care (PROSPEC).

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON24717
Enrollment
390
Registered
2018-06-11
Start date
2018-06-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-02-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Prostate cancer, survivorship, primary care, secondary care, follow-up, general practitioner, randomised controlled trial Dutch: Prostaatcarcinoom, overlevingszorg, eerstelijnszorg, tweedelijnszorg, nazorg, huisarts, gerandomiseerd gecontroleerde trial.

Interventions

The intervention is based on a primary care model where prostate cancer survivors will be referred to their GP for follow-up and aftercare after the first follow-up visit at the hospital. All patients

Sponsors

Antoni van Leeuwenhoek-Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Men diagnosed with invasive prostate cancer; 2. Stage cT1a–cT3; pNx–pN1; R0-1 having completed primary treatment (prostatectomy or radiotherapy); 3. Radiotherapy with or without androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for localized prostate cancer 4. No evidence of recurrence (PSA<0.1 ng/ml after prostatectomy or PSA< nadir+2.0 ng/mL after radiotherapy).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Primary treatment (prostatectomy, radiotherapy) not completed at least 3 months previously; 2. Patients under active surveillance; 3. Under investigation for possible recurrence (patients become eligible if recurrence is ruled out); 4. Does not have a community-based GP to provide care; 5. Unable to comply with study protocol including completion of questionnaires; 6. Actively followed by a cancer specialist for another primary cancer; 7. (Previously) enrolled in a study requiring ongoing follow-up by a cancer specialist; 8. Serious (treatment related) toxicity that requires treatment; 9. Patients that cannot sign informed consent or are unable to understand Dutch.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To compare GP-based follow-up care of prostate cancer survivors with traditional, specialist-based follow-up care in terms of adherence to the prostate surveillance guideline represented by the rate of PSA measurements.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To compare the effect of GP-based follow-up care of prostate cancer survivors with traditional, specialist-based follow-up care in terms of: (1) The time from a BCR to prostate cancer retreatment decision-making; (2) The management of treatment-related side effects (APECC survey); (3) Health-related quality of life and prostate cancer-related anxiety (EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-PR25 and MAX-PC questionnaire; (4) Continuity of care (NCQ survey); (5) Costs-effectiveness (EQ-5D-5L); (6) Experience with the follow-up and intervention study (interviews).

Contacts

Public ContactBarbara M.H.E. Wollersheim
prospec@nki.nl020-512-6087

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)