Skip to content

Self-sizing Radiofrequency Ablation balloon for eradication of Barrett's esophagus: a randomized trial comparing three different treatment regimens

Self-sizing Radiofrequency Ablation balloon for eradication of Barrett's esophagus: a randomized trial comparing three different treatment regimens

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON24632
Enrollment
108
Registered
2015-05-18
Start date
2015-09-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-02-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Barrett's esophagus, Barrett's neoplasia, Barrett's dysplasia, Radiofrequency ablation, Intestinal metaplasia

Interventions

Circumferential radiofrequency ablation of Barrett's esophagus with the Self-sizing RFA balloon. Inspection of the Barrett’s segment and randomization The esophagus is evaluated using white light hi

Sponsors

KU Gasthuisberg Leuven, Belgium
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients aged 18-85 years, with biopsy proven LGD, HGD or EC in a BE after local expert pathology review. 2. Scheduled circumferential ablation for BE with flat LGD, HGD, or for BE after prior endoscopic resection (ER) for lesions containing HGD or EC (<2 cm and <50% of the circumference). 3. Pretreatment biopsies and/or ER specimens reviewed by a local expert pathologist. 4. Written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients with a BE segment 15 cm prior to ER. 2. Any prior endoscopic ablation treatment. 3. Significant esophageal stenosis prior to initial treatment, preventing passage of a therapeutic endoscope OR any prior endoscopic dilatation for esophageal stenosis. 4. Presence of esophageal varices. 5. Anti-coagulant therapy (apart from aspirin or NSAID) that cannot be discontinued prior to ER or RFA, OR uncorrectable hemostatic disorders. 6. In case of prior ER: patients with ER of multiple lesions in a single ER session are not eligible, if one of the resections measures more than the aforementioned size criteria, OR if resections of different lesions are not separated by a free circumferential segment of at least 1 cm. 7. In case of prior ER: a specimen showing carcinoma with positive vertical resection margins, deep submucosal invasion (>T1sm1), poorly or undifferentiated cancer (G3 or G4), or lymphatic/vascular invasion. 8. In case of prior ER: invasive cancer in any of the biopsies obtained at high-resolution endoscopy after ER. 9. An interval > 6 months between the last high-resolution endoscopy with biopsies and RFA. 10. An interval < 6 weeks between ER and RFA. 11. Patients unable to give informed consent.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Primary outcome: Percentage of endoscopically visual surface regression of BE epithelium at 3 months, as scored by two independent endoscopists blinded to the treatment regimen.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Adverse events 2. Patient’s discomfort after RFA treatment 3. Procedure time

Contacts

Public ContactJ.J.G.H.M. Bergman

AMC Departement of Gastroenterology C2-216

j.j.bergman@amc.uva.nl0031 (0)205663556

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)