Skip to content

Vergelijking van twee standscorrectie operaties van het onderbeen bij knieartrose.

Accuracy of achieved correction of open versus closed wedge high tibial osteotomies, with locking plate fixation.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON24339
Enrollment
124
Registered
2010-09-14
Start date
2010-10-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-02-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Patients, age 18–60, with isolated medial compartment osteoarthritis (OA), concomitant with a varus mechanical axis of the knee, good range of motion and limited ligamentous knee laxity.

Interventions

1. Group A: Medial open wedge high tibial osteotomy
2. Group B: Lateral closed wedge high tibial osteotomy. Both techniques using locking plate fixation and with identical postoperative care.

Sponsors

Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam The Netherlands
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Knee pain located over the medial tibiofemoral compartment of the knee; 2. Knee pain for more than 3 months, with a severity of the knee pain of more than 20 mm on a VAS score (range 0 to 100 mm); 3. Radiographic signs of knee OA, defined by a Kellgren & Lawrence score of grade 1-3; 4. Presence of varus malalignment as measured on a whole leg radiograph.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. OA of the lateral compartment; 2. Grade-3 collateral ligament laxity; 3. Range of motion of 10°; 5. History of fracture or previous open operation of the lower limb; 6. ACL rupture; 7. Rheumatoid arthritis; 8. Patients with a contralateral HTO will be excluded if the first knee has been included in this trial; thus, if both knees are symptomatic, only the first knee will be included; 9. Patients from whom it is not sure that they will be able to attend the follow-up measurements; 10. Insufficient command of the Dutch language, spoken and/or written.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The main endpoint of the study is difference between the pre-planned correction and the achieved correction both the hip-knee ankle angle and lateralisation of the mechanical axis. The goal of the osteotomy is to achieve a 3-4 degrees overcorrection (valgus) in the frontal plane (Hip Knee Ankle angle). The final achieved correction will be assessed at the whole leg radiograph 6 weeks postoperatively.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Difference in the following outcome parameter after 6 weeks, 12 and 24 months and 5 years, in pain severity (Visual Analogue Scale; VAS), Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Hospital for Special Surgery scale (HSS). Also difference in complications, side effects, and medicine consumption will be assessed. A blinded physical examination (bandage over the whole proximal tibia) of the knee will be performed (stability of the medial and lateral collateral ligaments, and range of motion). A true lateral radiograph of the knee in at least 30 degrees of flexion will be used to determine the length of the patella tendon according to Insall-Salvati (IS ratio). The posterior inclination angle of the tibia plateau (PI) will be measured on a lateral radiograph according to Moore-Harvey. Bone mineral density of the medial and lateral compartment of the tibia (predefined regions of interest) will be assessed by DXA scan. A DXA scan will be performed preoperatively and postoperatively at 6 weeks, 12 and 24 months. Whole leg radiographs will be made preoperatively and direct postoperatively, followed by 6 weeks, and 24 months postoperatively.

Contacts

Public ContactM. Reijman

Department of Orthopedics PO box 2040

m.reijman@erasmusmc.nl+31 (0)10 4033642

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)