Skip to content

Dynamic bracing for OVCFs

The effectiveness and cost effectiveness of dynamic bracing versus standard care alone in patients suffering from osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON24180
Enrollment
98
Registered
2020-06-30
Start date
2020-12-21
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-06-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs)

Interventions

This is a multicenter, two-armed, parallel-group randomized controlled trial with a 1:1 allocation ratio consisting of an effect, economic and process evaluation. Postmenopausal women with a recent sy

Sponsors

Bauerfeind
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: - Postmenopausal women; - A symptomatic thoracolumbar osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (less than 6 weeks old); - Eligible for questionnaires with sufficient understanding of the Dutch written language.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: - Unstable vertebral fractures amenable for operative treatment; - Neurologic deficit; - Severe spinal deformity (scoliosis); - Infection; - Active cancer; - Psychiatric or mental disease; - Insufficient cognitive or language skills to complete the questionnaires.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary outcome parameter is quality of life at one year after intervention. This will be measured using the Quality of Life Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis (Qualeffo-41).

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary outcome parameters are pain, pain medication used, functional disability, sagittal spinal alignment, recurrence rate of OVCFs and physical activity in daily life. Static sagittal alignment and recurrence fracture rate will be analyzed on standardized lateral full-spine radiographs using validated software. For patients included in the Maastricht University Medical Center gait quality and postural balance will be assessed using the computer-assisted rehabilitation environment (CAREN, Motek-force Link). Physical activity and gait speed in daily life will be assessed with the MOX activity monitor.

Contacts

Public ContactEva Jacobs

Maastricht University Medical Center

e.jacobs@maastrichtuniversity.nl0615070280

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)