Skip to content

Diaphragm paralysis; surgery or mechanical ventilation?

Diaphragm paralysis; surgery or mechanical ventilation?

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON24116
Enrollment
20
Registered
2021-08-05
Start date
2022-01-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-02-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

20 participants >18 year and diagnosed with a unilateral of bilateral diaphragm paralysis resulting from phrenic nerve injury.

Interventions

Intervention: Surgical diaphragm-plication Comparator: Non-invasive mechanical ventilation

Sponsors

ZonMw
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: In order to be eligible to participate in this study, a participant must meet all of the following criteria: • >18 years • diagnosed with a unilateral or bilateral diaphragm paralysis based on isolated phrenic nerve injury. o Unilateral or bilateral diaphragm paralysis is defined as follows: complaints of dyspnea and / or orthopnea combined with a drop in VC of more than 15% when change from upright to supine position and a positive sniff test during fluoroscopy or ultrasonography. A positive sniff test means that the diaphragm stands still or even moves in cranial direction (paradoxical movement ) during the sniff inspiratory maneuver. • Ability to provide written consent • Time between diagnosis and treatment should be at least 1 year

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: A potential subject who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation in this study: • Patients diagnosed with a unilateral or bilateral diaphragm paralysis due to a more systemic neurological or neuromuscular disorder like for example Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis , • Hypercapnia during daytime (PaCO2 > 6.0 kPa) • Radiotherapy of the thorax • Contra indication for diaphragm surgery.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary question of the pilot study is whether a randomized trial comparing surgery versus non-invasive ventilation is feasible. In our opinion a randomized study is feasible if at least 50% of the participants fulfilling the inclusions criteria are randomized in this pilot study.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The second goal of the pilot study is to describe the effect of both plication and NIV on the . primary endpoint being quality of life measured by the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire. Secondary endpoints are; the Medical Research Council (MRC) dyspnoea scale, the Diaphragmatic Paralysis Questionnaire, Borg dyspnoea score, Endurance Shuttle Walk Test (ESWT), spirometry in both sitting and supine position, a polysomnography and transcutaneous measurement of carbon dioxide an oxygen saturation at night.

Contacts

Public ContactAnda Hazenberg

UMCG

a.hazenberg@umcg.nl0503613200

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)