ABS; transvaginal vs peri-anal approach.

Artificial Bowel Sphincter implantation; transvaginal versus peri-anal approach.

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

NL-OMON

Registry ID

NL-OMON23692

Enrollment

Registered

2008-02-28

Start date

2008-03-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-02-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Faecal incontinence.

Interventions

1. Artificial bowel sphincter system

2. implantation.

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Females 2. Informed consent 3. Older than 18 years 4. On the waiting list for ABS implantation.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Males 2. ABS revision 3. New ABS implantation after prior explantation due to infection.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Infection.	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
1. Quality of life; 2. Incontinence scores.	—

Contacts

Public ContactJ.T. Dissel, van

Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum Postbus 9600

j.t.van_dissel@lumc.nl+31715262613

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)