Skip to content

Deep Brain Stimulation in Treatment-refractory patients with Major Depressive Disorder.

Deep Brain Stimulation in Treatment-refractory patients with Major Depressive Disorder.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON23670
Enrollment
26
Registered
2009-11-23
Start date
2010-01-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-02-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Major Depressive Disorder

Interventions

Stereotactic implantation of bilateral DBS electrodes in the nucleus accumbens in the DBS group. After an optimization period of 3 months (if necessary prolonged until 6 months), a double blind cros

Sponsors

Academic Medical Center (AMC) Amsterdam, NL St Elizabeth Ziekenhuis Tilburg NL
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Primary diagnosis: MDD (single episode or recurrent; 296.2 or 296.3) according to the DSM-IV criteria based on a psychiatric interview and the SCID as diagnostic instrument; 2. Illness duration > 2 years, chronic MDD; 3. HAM-D total > 18; 4. Disabling severity with substantial functional impairment according to the DSM-IV criterion C and a Global Assessment of Function (GAF) score of 45 or less; 5. The level of impairment must have been persistent for at least 2 years; 6. Age: 18-65 years old; 7. Written informed consent; 8. Able to fully understand the consequences of the procedure (IQ > 80); 9. Dutch or English speaking and able to answer the study questions; 10. Capable to make his or her own choice without coercion; 11. Treatment refractoriness defined as failure of: A. At least 2 adequate treatments of at least two distinctly different classes of 2nd generation antidepressants (SSRI, SNRI, NaSSA) for a period of 6-8 weeks, and; B. An adequate trial of a TCA 6-8 weeks (at therapeutic drug levels), and; C. TCA + addition of lithium when tolerable at least 6 weeks at therapeutic drug levels (>0.6 mmol/L), and; D. An adequate trial of a MAOI, and; E. ≥6 sessions of ECT, for which the series of ECT was terminated either due to adverse effects or insufficient response (including at least 6 sessions of bilateral ECT). OR: F. Patients who are kept stable with maintenance ECT, but who relapse after discontinuation of this maintenance ECT are also eligible, but need to fulfill the above inclusion criteria.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Unstable physical condition; 2. Organic cause; 3. Parkinson’s disease, dementia, epilepsy; 4. Schizophrenia/ history of psychosis unrelated to MDD; 5. Alcohol or substance abuse (including benzodiazepines) during last 6 months; 6. Current Tic disorder; 7. Antisocial personality disorder; 8. Bipolar Disorder; 9. Pregnancy; 10. Mental retardation; 11. Participation in a SPECT study in the year prior to this study; 12. Standard MRI scan exclusion criteria (pregnancy, pacemaker and metals contraindicated for MRI except for the DBS implantation and stimulator itself); 13. The use of anticoagulants must be able to be stopped before surgery.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main study: 1. The Hamilton depression rating scale and the Montgomery Åsberg depression rating scale: A. Improvement is defined as a drop in HDRS or MADRS of 25–49%; B. Response is defined as ≥50% decrease from baseline in HDRS or MADRS; C. Remission as HDRS ≤7 or MADRS ≤7. Neuroimaging/neuropsychology study: 1. Changes in dopaminergic system; 2. Changes in activity in cortical-limbic-thalamic-striatal network; 3. Change in cognitive functioning before and after DBS.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Main study: 1. Other efficacy measures: A. Inventory for Depressive Symptoms (IDS-SR); B. Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A); C. Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS); D. Symptom Checklist 90 (SCL-90); E. Quality of life enjoyment and satisfaction Questionnaire and MOS SF36; F. Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS); G. The Clinical Global Impression (CGI). Neuroimaging/neuropsychology study: 1. Structural differences in cortical-limbic-thalamic-striatal network.

Contacts

Public ContactD. Denys

PO Box 75867

i.o.bergfeld@amc.uva.nl+31 (0)20 8913899

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)