Skip to content

Intracutaneously versus transcutaneously sutured ileostomy: A randomized multicenter trial (ISI trial).

Intracutaneously versus transcutaneously sutured ileostomy: A randomized multicenter trial (ISI trial).

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON23654
Enrollment
268
Registered
2010-06-09
Start date
2010-09-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-02-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

patients requiring an ileostomy for malignant or infectious diseases of the intestinal tract. ileostomy, leakage, feces, skin irritation, stitches, sutures

Interventions

The objective of this trial is to compare the effectiveness of intracutaneously versus transcutaneously sutured ileostomy to reduce leakage, costs and to improve patients’quality of life. The transcut

Sponsors

AMC
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. All patients who receive an end or loop ileostomy; 2. Age between 18 and 80 years; 3. Written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Life expectancy of less than one year; 2. BMI > 35 or < 18; 3. Emergency surgery; 4. ASA IV; 5. Insufficient command of the Dutch language or cognitively unable to complete Dutch questionnaires.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Leakage of feces under the stoma plaque and peristomal dermatitis around the stitches or due to leakage of feces.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Quality of life, as measured by the Stoma-Qol; 2. Stoma-related morbidity; 3. Cost analysis (Stoma materials and outpatient visits).

Contacts

Public ContactM.F. Sier

Meibergdreef 9

mfsier@amc.nl+31 (0)6 42273862

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)