Skip to content

Humeral Shaft Fractures: Measuring Recovery after Operative versus Non-operative Treatment (HUMMER): A multicenter comparative observational study.

Humeral Shaft Fractures: Measuring Recovery after Operative versus Non-operative Treatment (HUMMER): A multicenter comparative observational study.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON23527
Enrollment
400
Registered
2012-09-18
Start date
2012-11-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-02-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Humeral shaft fracture

Interventions

1. Operative treatment
2. Non-operative treatment.

Sponsors

Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Trauma Research Unit, Department of Surgery Erasmus Medical Center, Medical Research Ethics Committee (MREC)
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Adult men or women aged 18 years and older (with no upper age limit); 2. A fracture of the humeral shaft, AO class 12A or 12B (confirmed on X-ray); 3. Operation within 14 days after presentation to the ED (if this is the treatment of choice); 4. Provision of informed consent by patient.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Polytraumatized patients affecting treatment and rehabilitation of the affected arm; 2. Patients treated with an external fixator; 3. Patients with pathological, recurrent or open humeral shaft fracture; 4. Patients with neurovascular injuries requiring immediate surgery (excl. radial nerve palsy); 5. Additional traumatic injuries of the affected arm that influence upper extremity function; 6. Patients with an impaired upper extremity function (i.e., stiff or painful arm or neurological disorder of the upper limb) prior to the injury; 7. Retained hardware around the affected humerus; 8. Patients with rheumatoid arthritis; 9. Bone disorder which may impair bone healing (excluding osteoporosis); 10. Patients incapable of ensuring follow-up (e.g., no fixed address or cognitive impairment); 11. Insufficient comprehension of the Dutch language to understand the rehabilitation program and other treatment information.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand) score.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Constant score; 2. Pain level (VAS); 3. Range of Motion of the shoulder and elbow joints; 4. Rate of complications; 5. Rate of secondary interventions; 6. Time to resumption of work and activities of daily living; 7. Health-related quality of life (SF-36 and EQ-5D); 8. Costs; 9. Cost-effectiveness.

Contacts

Public ContactD. Hartog, den

Erasmus MC, dept. of Surgery-Traumatology Mailbox H-822k 's-Gravendijkwal 230, 3015 CE Rotterdam P.O. Box 2040

d.denhartog@erasmusmc.nl+31-10 7031050

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)